Wednesday, June 15, 2016

Jesus: The Christ and Christology In Islam.

The Quran speaks in a special way that connects a period before the creation, after the creation, destruction and the endless life. It also relates the role and relation of God, Angels, Jinns and Humans, both in between these creatures and with them to the creator.

Specialists in the study of Islam acknowledge that Christology had a real historical role that plays— in Islam, not in Christianity. It was founded on the base of derailed Jews from the teachings Moses and later of Christians from the teachings of Jesus.

Muslims never pay attention to the question of whether Islam has been influenced by History, Judaism, Christianity, or their sects in any way, because itself clarify, what is it and how it revealed to them. The Qur'an reveals the truth about past and future, discloses hidden things, similarly disclosed the truth of the history of mankind, true nature of prophetic mission, God's Message and their role in a straight line which includes Christ and his miraculous work. The exception is that Jesus was the Messiah to the sons of Israel, the last one of a series of Prophets among them.
"Jesus was no more than a mortal whom we favored and made an example to the Israelites." (Sura 43:59)
The Qur'an speaks about Christ in 14 suras (90 different verses). More attention is given to Abraham and Moses than to Jesus. Four of the 14 suras are from the Meccan period, a period during which Muhammad had to cope with much resistance to his message from the Gentiles in Mecca. This resistance was focused on his message about the resurrection. The other 10 suras which speak about Jesus date back to the Medinan period, the period during which there was increased tension with and hostility toward Jews and to a lesser extent toward Christians.

Two things attract the attention in what is written about Jesus in the Qur'an. The first is that the Life of Christ is linked to miraculous events. His birth is a miraculous event; the virgin Mary gives birth Jesus. Mary and her son "are a sign to the world and blessing from God to the Israelis"-(Sura 19:21). Not only the beginning of his life, but also the end of his life on earth is surrounded by mystery. He leaves the world in a mysterious way. And during his life he performs miracles, in his childhood as well as in his youth after awarded the prophetic mission. 

The second thing that draws attention to what is written in the Qur'an about Jesus is the strong emphasis on Jesus as no more than a human being, called by God to be a messenger, bringing the Holy Scripture (Injil ie. Gospel) to his people banu Israel. He is the son of Mary, not the Son of God. The concentration on the unity (tawhid) of God leads to an impassioned protest against what is seen as a deification of a human prophet by the followers of Jesus. It is considered a grave sin to shift attention from the message to the messenger, to put the person of the prophet on a level with God, to give a partner to the one supreme and Transcendent God.

The Qur'anic Jesus could be called a second Adam, but not in the same sense as in the New Testament (Romans 5:14; 1 Corinthians 15:22). In the Qur'an, Jesus is compared to Adam, because like Adam, Jesus was born through the creative Word of God (Sura 3:42-52; 19:16-36). 
The angels said to Mary: "God bids you rejoice in a Word from him. He is Messiah, shall be named Jesus, the son of Mary. He shall be noble in this world and the world next and he shall be favoured by God. He shall preach to men in his cradle and in the prime of manhood, and shall lead a righteous life." "Lord," she said, "how can I bear a child when no man has touched me?" He replied: "Such is the will of Allah. He creates whom he will. When he decrees a thing he need only to say "Be" and it is. -(Sura 3:45-47)
Jesus is like Adam in the sight of God. He created him of dust and then said to him "Be" and he was. -(3:59)
The birth of Jesus is here related to the creative Word of God. In Sura 4:171 the divine Spirit is mentioned in relation to Jesus' birth. The birth of Jesus is seen as a sign [aya} of God's power. The word aya applied to the wonders of nature as attesting to God's existence, power, and bounty. The prophets are also seen as a sign of God. The punishment of unbelievers (Sura 15:75) and the deliverance of believers (29:24) are ayat ie. signs, of the intervening power of God in history. Lastly, the verses of the Qur'an are also called ayat [signs]. Human life is surrounded by signs of God's power and majesty in nature, in history, in the lives of the prophets, and in the Holy Scriptures they bring to the world.

Not only Jesus' birth is seen as a sign, but also the miracles he performs are considered to be ayat. One of the miracles told in the Qur'an is also found in the Gospel of Thomas (Michaelis 1956:99-100). It is the story about the child Jesus giving life to birds made of clay (Sura 3:49; 5:110).

Many words used in this story are also used in the creation story of Adam (Sura 3:42-52; 19:16-36; 32:9). Sura 3:49: Jesus makes; Sura 6:2: God makes; (Arabic: khalaqa). Sura 3:48: Jesus makes from clay; Sura 6:2: God makes from clay; (Arabic: mina Min). Sura 3:49: Jesus breathes into it; Sura 32:9: God breathes into it; (Arabic: nafakha). The Arabic imperative kun (Be) used in the creation story (Sura 3:47) is also used in this story (kun fa-ya kun). There is a very clear parallelism between the creation story and the story about the miracle performed by the child Jesus. Another miracle mentioned in Sura 5:110  is "restoring the dead to life." that will be happened in the Day of Standing when Jesus Questioned of his duties  in his earthly life as the message about the resurrection of the dead.  
God will say: "Jesus, Son of Mary, remember the favour I have bestowed on you and on your mother: how I strengthened you with the Holy Spirit, so that you preached to people in your cradle and in the prime of your manhood; how I instructed you in the Scriptures and in Wisdom, in the Torah and in the Gospel; how by my leave you fashioned from clay the likeness of a bird; how, by my leave, you healed the blind man and the leper and, by my leave, restored the dead to life."
Quranic message about the resurrection met unbelief, scorn, and ridicule. To the unbelief and mockery, Qur'an responded by pointing to the creation, the creative power of God. The one who is able to create human beings is also able to restore the dead to life.

Jesus' life and work, as described in the Qur'an, are in a special way linked to the life-creating and life-renewing power of God. God's Word created Jesus, Jesus gave life to birds of clay, Jesus raised people from death. Yet, the Qur'an emphasizes that Jesus does not have a special position among all the prophets sent by God to different nations. Adam was created in a similar way to Jesus. And the miracles performed by Jesus could only be performed "by my leave" (Sura 5:110). Jesus does not have special power. Power is given him in certain cases, as it is given to other messengers, in order to reduce the resistance against the message preached by God's messengers.
Say: "We believe in God and that which is revealed to us; in what was revealed to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob and the tribes; to Moses and Jesus and the other prophets by their Lord. We make no distinction amongst any of them and to God we have surrendered ourselves." (Sura 2:136; also 43:59 and 3:84)
The Qur'an does not tell much about the message and the teachings of Jesus. He brought to his people the same message that was brought by Muhammad and other prophets to their people. It is the message about the one supreme, transcendent God, whose power and goodness require obedience and gratitude. This God is a God of justice, rewarding the obedient and punishing the evildoers. God has taught Jesus "the Torah and the Gospel" (Sura 3:48). In his teaching Jesus is called to confirm the Torah and to bring to his people the gospel "wherein is guidance and light" (5:46). 

Jesus also points to the future, to the coming of a new prophet, whose name is Ahmad (Ahmed means "He, Who Praises" and Muhammad means "The Praised One"). 
"And of Jesus, who said to the Israelites: I am sent forth to you by God to confirm the Torah already revealed and to give news of a messenger that will come after me whose name is Ahmad' " (61:6).
Jesus faces the same kind of opposition as other prophets, who are accused of being liars (Sura 35:4, 25), of being possessed by jinn (23:70), and of performing magic (5:110). The hostility of Jews finds expression in the  plan to kill Jesus. The only passage where we can read about "the crucifixion" is Sura 4:150"163. This passage dates from the time of very strained relations with the Jews in Medina. In those ayat attention is focused on the disobedience of Jews in the past in the time of Moses, their breaking of the covenant, the breaking of the Sabbath" laws, the killing of prophets, and the "the uttering of a monstrous falsehood against Mary" (Sura 4:156). Hearing all these, the Jews of Medina have also declared: 
"We have put to death the Messiah Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of God" (4:157). 
In response to this claim, God reveals the truth about Jesus to Muhammad: 
They did not kill him, nor did they crucify him, but they thought they did [Arabic: shubbiha lahum]. Those that disagreed about him were in doubt concerning his death, for what they knew about it was sheer conjecture; they were not sure that they had slain him. God lifted him up to His presence; He is Mighty and Wise. (Sura 4:157, 158)
These Quranic Verses translated by Paret as: 
But (in reality) they neither killed (nor) crucified him. Rather (a different one) appeared, like him (so that they confused him with Jesus and killed him). And those who are divided about him are (really) in doubt about him. They have no knowledge of him and pursue speculations. And they have not killed him with certainty. No, God took him up to himself (into heaven). God is powerful and wise.'-Rudi Paret (1963) 
There are three questions arises from these verses.The first is, why the Jews of Madina made this kind of boastful statement regarding Jesus' death?."  We have no evidence that the Jews emphasized their part in the crucifixion. So the Scholars of these days means that Muhammad [?] speak about Jews in this way, may be to find allies among the Christians in a time of tensions with the Jews.

The second one is how the Arabic words shubbiha lahum should be translated. The quoted translation (Dawood 1979) translates: "they though they did." Paret's (1963) translation is "a different one appeared, like him." Masson translates: "The Jews have not killed him, neither crucified him, but it seemed so to them (they themselves are in doubt about this issue)."-Masson (1958:330)

The Arabic root shbh is not often used in the Qur'an. It can mean "making equal or similar" or "being doubtful, uncertain, obscure." -Parets (1963) translation is based on the idea that another person was crucified instead of Jesus. Another person was made equal or similar to Jesus. This interpretation of the crucifixion was well-known in Gnostic circles (docetism). 

The background of the rejection of the crucifixion is the thought that almighty God cannot allow one of His messengers a shameful death, condemned and death on the cross with some culprits. The Jews, those thought that they had crucified Jesus, but they erroneously thought so. It seemed so to them. The reality, however, was that God would not allow it to happen. 

This third is, how these verses relates to other verses of the Qur'an, where we read about the death of Jesus?. for example,-
"I was blessed on the day I (Jesus) was born and blessed I shall be on the day of my death" (Sura 19:33; 3:55; 5:117).
Zaehner (1958), Parrinder (1965), and others are of the opinion that, according to the Qur'an, Jesus died on the cross. Jews did not do it, but God caused Jesus to die on the cross, and after his death on the cross Jesus was raised up high to God. This explanation can't be accepted, in the light of the Qur'an. A messengers of God, who when threatened and harassed by the Jews were rescued by God's power. Why should an almighty God cause the death of one of his messengers? Would that not be a defeat in the eyes of those who opposed the messenger?

Maulana Muhammad Ali (1938:197), an interpreter, states that Jesus was on the cross but did not die on the cross. The Ahmadiyya translation of Sura 4:157-158 is "they killed him not nor did they cause his death on the cross." [Jesus died a natural death, according to the Ahmadiyya explanation, at an advanced aged, after having worked and preached for many years in the East [in India].

The generally accepted view regarding Quranic verses of the crucifixion did not happen. Jesus was rescued by an intervening act of God. What people intended to do did not happen because of this divine intervention. 
"They plotted, but God plotted too. And of plotters God is the best" (Sura 8:30). 
Jesus was taken into heaven, from where he will return to the earth to complete his mission as a messenger of God, before kiyamah, the appointed time for destruction. And when he shall completed his work, shall die a natural death. In this way, Ahmadiyya relates verses 4:157-158 to the other verses of the Qur'an which speak about the death of Jesus. This eschatological view in regard to Jesus is based on an obscure verse in the Qur'an which says, 
"Jesus is a portent of the "Hour of Doom". Have no doubt about its coming" (Sura 43:61).
This view has found expression in some of the creedal statements of the Islamic community, like Fiqh Akbar II, where it is said in article 29:

The report of the ascension is a reality, and whosoever rejects it is an erring schismatic. The appearance of the Anti-Christ, Yadjuj and Madjuj [Gog-Magog], the rising of the sun from the place where it sets, the descent of Isa [Jesus] from Heaven, as well as the other "Eschatological Signs" according to the description thereof in authentic Tradition, are a reality that will take place. (Wensinck 1965:197) There are many traditions related to the role Jesus will play when he returns to earth in the last day (Stieglecker 1962:745).

al Tabari (10th century) quotes in his commentary on Sura 4:157-158. Their interpretation is the generally accepted interpretation that the crucifixion did not happen, because of God's rescuing intervention. So, Zaehner (1958:214), Commented Muslim interpreters "are rejecting the very words of the Qur'an; they rightly describe themselves as "Ahi al Sunna," the People of Tradition, and not as "Ahi al Kitab," the People of the Book."

Many different names and titles are given to Jesus in the Qur'an. He is called "Son of Mary", Messiah, "Word of God", "Spirit of God", one of the blessed One, those brought near (to God), Rasul (Messenger), Nabi (Prophet), 'Abd (servant), and one worthy regarding this world and the world to come. And the title Messiah have a special meaning in the Qur'an, this title we found both in the "Old Testament" and in the "New Testament". that he was the last prophet to the Jews as he brought mercy of God to them through Gospel.

Jesus was the Word [kalima] of God, not Son of God, because he was created by the Word of God. In Islamic theology, God doesn't need to say anything as He is so Holy. But the Holy Spirits ie. the angels nearest to God and the Scriber's of the "Mother Book", able to understand that and stored in the Mighty Book in its original form from which it can be sent to this material world; the Word of God can become flesh;  can be interpreted by the messengers in His 0wn languages, writing and forming a book of God. 

The Qur'an—not incarnation, but what Wolfson (1976) has called "inlibration."The important theological discussions in the history of Islam have not been on the role of Muhammad, but on the Qur'an, on the question of whetherthe Qur'an is the created and uncreated Word of God,Spirit from God. The birth of Jesus is related to the Spirit of God: 
"... and of the woman (Mary) who kept her chastity. We breathed into her of Our Spirit and made her and her son a sign to all men". -(Sura 21:91; 66:12). In a similar way the Qur'an speaks about the creation of Adam. -(15:29;38:72). 
Other verses speak about Jesus' being strengthened by God with the holy Spirit (Sura 2:87, 253; 5:110). In these verses, the holy Spirit is Gabriel who directly related to the miracles performed by Jesus. The holy Spirit is not connected with the message preached by Jesus. Suras 16:102 and 26:193 relate the holy Spirit to the message preached by Muhammad and contained in the Qur'an.
Say: "The Holy Spirit brought it [the Qur'an] down from your Lord in truth to reassure the faithful and to give guidance and good news to those that surrender themselves to God" -(Sura 16:102).
Followers of Jesus at the period of Muhammad are criticized in the Qur'an for different reasons. One point of criticism is the disunity among Christians and between Christians and Jews. Having received the same message from God, they should be one; they should accept each other's prophets.
The Jews say the Christians are misguided and the Christians say it is the Jews who are misguided. Yet they both read the Scriptures. -(Sura 2:113)
Your religion is but one religion, and I am your only Lord. Therefore serve Me. They [Jews and Christians] have divided themselves into schisms, but to Us they shall all return. -(21:93)
Christians have also gone astray by deifying their prophet, by saying things about Jesus that cannot be true. 
Unbelievers are those that say: "God is the Messiah, the Son of Mary." For the Messiah himself said: "Children of Israel, serve God, my Lord and your Lord" -(5:72).
Qur'an informed us that the Arabian Christians during the prophet Muhammad were not only worshipped Jesus, but also his mother [Both of their Paintings embedded in a wall of Kaba, which destroyed by the deep Jafrany colour after Muslims victory over Mecca]. At the day of Judgement when the prophet and the people Questioned on their deeds, Qur'an says Jesus shall be asked as- 
Then God will say: "Jesus, son of Mary, did you ever say to humankind: Worship me and my mother as gods beside God?" "Glory to You," He will answer, "how could I say that to which I have no right? If I had ever said so, You would have surely known it. You know what is in my mind, but I cannot tell what is in Yours. You alone know what is hidden. I spoke to them of nothing except what You bade me. I said: "Serve God, my Lord and your Lord." -(Sura 5:116)
Apparently this perception based on what the Christians belief was during the prophet Muhammad. And after this verse, Muhammad protested against the deification of Mary and her son [It reminds us of Nestorian objections against calling Mary theotokos].

Qur'an explicitly rejects the trinity of God- the Father, Mary- the Mother, and Jesus- the Son. (When the Qur'an uses the words "Son of God," [The Arabic walad means of son in a physical sense.]

The question Muhammad struggled with in Medina was the question of how Christians could have wrong ideas about God and his prophet Jesus after having received the divine revelation in their Holy Scripture, the Injil, brought to them by their prophet. Or, to phrase the question in another way, why were Christians (and Jews) not willing to accept Muhammad as a prophet for the Arabs, bringing to the Arabs in their language the same message which had been brought already by the prophets of the Jews to the Jews and by Christ to the Christians? The Qur'an answers these questions by stating that-
"some of the Jews have already heard the Word of God and knowingly have perverted it" -(Sura 2:75; 5:41; Arabic: harrafa, to pervert). 
In regard to Christians, it is said that they have forgotten a part or hidden part of the Scriptures (5:15). These and other verses have become the foundation for the "Doctrine of Tahrif", the corruption of Sacred Scriptures. This doctrine states that the message of their prophets became corrupted in the hands of followers of Moses and Jesus. On the other hand, it is believed that the the Qur'an is uncorrupted, pure Word of God, identical with the Umm al-Kitab, the mother of the book, the original copy of the Book of Allah in heaven. The Qur'an corrects the misconceptions of Jews and Christians contained in their Scriptures.

The disappointing experiences with Jews and Christians in the Medinan period were one of the reasons why Muhammad started to pay more attention to Abraham, who was neither a Jew nor a Christian -(Sura 3:65-68; 2:140), a man of pure faith, a God-seeker (hanif), a Muslim, one who has submitted himself totally to God. (2:135; 4:125). 

Muhammad is described in Qur'an as the friend of God -(4:125), as in Isaiah 41:8,9 and James 2:23; as the father of those who believe--(Sura 22:78), as also in Romans 4:9-16 and Galatians 3:29. There is a certain analogy between the way in which Paul and Muhammad go back to Abraham in their encounter with Jews -(van Leeuwen 1964:230-231).

Among some scholars there is the tendency to interpret Qur'anic sayings about Jesus from a Christian perspective. Emphasis is put on the virgin birth, on the miracles performed by Jesus, on the way the Qur'an speaks about Jesus as "Word of God" and "Spirit from God," on the ascension after the crucifixion which did or did not happen, on the rejection of misconceptions of the Trinity, and of Jesus as "Son of God," misconceptions also rejected by Christian orthodoxy. One of these scholars, Zaehner, writes:
"So far as his Christology is concerned Muhammad, in the Qur'an, nowhere denies and sometimes affirms specifically Christian beliefs Traditional Muslim orthodoxy started to deny explicitly specific Christian doctrines." -Zaehner (1958:216),
It is a question of whether Zaehner's statement is right or not. The Qur'an speaks about Jesus in a context totally different from the context in which the present Bible speaks about Jesus. That becomes clear when attention is paid to "the history of salvation" in the Qur'an and to the Qur'anic concept of revelation.

Monotonous, with only minor variations, the same drama was played again and again on the stage of history.-(Paret 1957:90-91). There were in Muhammad's life three periods or moments of crisis. The first was when he became dissatisfied with the religious and moral situation of his people in Mecca. He had heard about other people worshipping one God, having prophets and holy writings. He had gained some knowledge about Jews and Christians. He was aware of other dissatisfied people like himself, the Hanifa, God-seekers, who tried to find new ways in religious life. The main question Muhammad struggled with was the question of why his people did not worship the one supreme God, why no prophet had been sent to the Arab people to bring God's message to them.

In his search for new directions, for a new faith, Muhammad did not become a hanif. If he would have gone in that direction, he would not have played a role in the religious history of Mankind. Neither did he become a Christian. Christianity was a foreign religion in Arabia, not really part of the Arab world. His religious crisis was resolved when he aware within himself that he was called by God to bring the Arabs the message of God in their own language. He was to be for the Arabs what other prophets, like Moses and Jesus, had been to their people—a Warner, a Prophet. He saw the role of other prophets in the light for the role he was called to play among the Arabs. This role was to proclaim the message of the goodness and the unity of God, the creator and sustainer of heaven and earth, the God of justice, who would call people to account on the day of judgement. This message was,the same that all other prophets had proclaimed to their people. That is why, when he started to preach, he could advise people who were in doubt about his message to ask Jews and Christians. As Quran Says- 
"If you doubt what We have revealed to you, ask those who have read the Scriptures before you. The truth has come to you from your Lord: therefore do not doubt it" (Sura 10:94).
The second period of crisis came when his message was not accepted. There was a growing opposition and resistance to his message, especially because of the emphasis on the day of resurrection and the day of judgement. Again, Qur'an uses the past was in the service of the present. The past was used to help and to strengthen Muhammad in his struggle and to give a warning the opponents. Muhammad was pointed to the prophets before him, who also had experienced opposition from their people, but with the help of God they had gained the victory, and their opponents had been punished for their misdeeds. At the past in the light of actual History, It was interpreted to him that was going to be happened from the perspective that actually happened in the past. So, his experience was the same that other prophets experienced before him. History repeated itself again and again—
"Again and again the same act performed on the stage of history.-(Paret 1957).
One God—one message—different nations with different languages—different prophets preaching the same message in different languages—these prophets have the same experiences. Jesus is part of this history of salvation (Sura 3:56), a history told to strengthen Muhammad's claim to be the prophet for the Arabs. In this history, Jesus plays a role like the other prophets: proclaiming the one message of God, he affirms the message of previous prophets and points to the prophet who will come after him.

The third religious crisis occurred in Medina, when Muhammad discovered that neither Jews nor Christians could accept him as a prophet for the Arabs. Not the resistance of Arabs, but the resistance of Jews and Christians was now his problem. The resistance of those to whom the divine revelation had been given was very much difficult for him to understand. Qur'an explained this resistance as a resistance against the core of the prophetic message, the unity of God. This message on the unity of God, proclaimed by Jesus, had been abandoned by Christians. At the end of his mission, he was clarified once again how and why Christians had gone astray, leaving the path shown to them by their prophet, Jesus:

The Jews say Ezra is the Son of God, while the Christians say the Messiah is the Son of God. Such are their assertions, by which they imitate the infidels of old. God confound them! How perverse they are! They worship their rabbis and their monks, and the Messiah, the son of Mary, as gods beside God; though they were ordered to serve one God only. There is no God but Him. Exalted be He above those whom they deify beside Him. -(Sura 9:29-30)

The history of God's dealings with the nations is a history of prophets. One of these prophets is Jesus, the prophet before Muhammad, the seal of he prophets. His role and his message are not different from the role and the message of the other prophets. In what is regarded as the oldest sura by most scholars, we read:


Recite, in the name of the Lord who created,
created man from clots of blood.
Recite! Your Lord is the Most Bountiful One,
who by the pen taught man what he did not know.- (Sura 96:1-5)

God is the Creator and God is the one "who taught man by the pen what he did not know." The revelation of God comes to humankind in God's Work, God's Creation, and in God's Word, God's written Word. The message proclaimed by prophets is written down in Sacred Scriptures. The "special" revelation is the one message in written form. And the prophets are the instruments chosen by God to bring this revelation to their nations. 

In the Qur'an only five books are mentioned, the Suhuf of Abraham, the Torah brought by Moses, the Zabur (Psalms) of David, the Injil (Gospel) brought by Jesus, and the Qur'an brought by Muhammad. According to Muslim theologians, there have been many more sacred writings containing the message of God. All were Suhuf but the four are books, and of these four, only the Qur'an contains the divine message in an uncorrupted form as it's the last and preserved process includes a system of full memorized by a Group of people known Hafez, on the other hand, preserved process gradually technolozized in the course of time.

The transcendence and sovereignty of God are emphasized in the Qur'an. God and God's creatures cannot meet on the same level. The distance, the gap between Creator and creature, is unbridgeable. Yet, that does not mean that there is no relation. There is a relation established by God in his revelation. The revelation is not a coming of God into the world.

Absolute transcendence forbids as unheard of that Allah would himself come into the world to teach the people. As He is so Holy He need not to Instruct any. The scribers among the holy angels near to God understand the wills and instruction and order and they write them to the book of Life [Mother Book] in its original form, ie. not in word but as signals in wave form, nothing but a combination of various frequency. And from that mother book, [maybe the root of the Lote Tree in the unbridgeable abyss [border of the eternal and created world which is in the end part of the 4th Heaven (Universe), we lived in the 7th, ie in the bottom one of the array of flat shaped 7 Universes. Jinns- the spirited creature that made of fire could move upto the 3rd Universe before Quran sent down to the sky of 4th heaven, but for the protection of the Ayat, the then barred to confined to the end of our univers throwing fire ball to them if they ever try to cross the limit], unbridgeable abyss remains connected with the Mother book] the instructed signals in the wave form transmitted from unseen world to the material world through Lote Tree. The angels those resting on the leaves of that tree, receives the divine message and instruction to perform those in the right moment as they instructed. Thus we find here a combination of concepts: 

Jesus plays a unique role in the History of salvation of the Jews. He was the last one among the series of prophets to the sons of Israel, But he special things related to him ie. his birth, miracles, crucifixion-ascension etc makes him unique and Messiah to them.

He is one of the many prophets, "a man with a mission from God and therefore entitled to honour" (Yusuf Ali 1968:234). Therefore, it is difficult to accept the view of Zaehner and others that the Christology he finds in Islam- "Muhammad nowhere denies and sometimes affirms specifically Christian beliefs."

What does the message of the Qur'an in respect to Christ mean for the Muslim-Christian encounter, in witness and dialogue? The emphasis on the deity of Christ in certain Christian groups in the period of Muhammad led Qur'an to conclude that Christians giving partners to God, that Christians are not true and pure monotheists.

The way in which Christians in later centuries witnessed to Muslims often reinforced Qur'anic views about Christians worshiping a second God. They emphasised more on Christ as God than on God in Christ. The encounter with Muslims challenges the church to reflect again on the relation between God and Christ Have the final words been spoken at Nicaea and Chalcedon?

Among the Muslims who try to come to a better understanding of the tenets of the Christian faith are struck by the fact that there are among present-day Christians so many different views in regard to Christ. Does not this affirm the Qur'anic statements that the People of the Book are a disunited people?

It has to be acknowledged that the Islamic views of Jesus full of respect and honour, all Muslim speak about Jesus in a respectful way as their prophet and their Guiding Book teaches. Even in the  mystical circles, Jesus is seen as a perfect human being, who in his life attained a very close relation with God. Christians never tried in a similar way to come to a respectful understanding of what Muhammad showed and teaches. 

Many Muslims have been (are) deeply offended by the negative way, in which the Christian Scholars, in the past and at present, tried to depict Muhammad, the seal of the prophets, the Messiah for Mankind, adding a lots of false with the fact in all their spoken and written form of the source of knowledge.

Kenneth Cragg (1979:31) has more than once spoken about "the Christian potential of the Qur'an." There is a danger that Christian ideas or concepts are projected into the Qur'an when the Qur'an uses words like "Messiah," "Word of God," and "Spirit of God" in relation to Jesus. These words are used in a context that differ than that of biblile. Both context never carry the same meaning In dealing with Jesus' "crucifixion" in the Qur'an,"

Cragg emphasizes that the Qur'an acknowledges that there is the intention and will to crucify the preacher/healer Jesus, and that there is on Jesus' side the readiness and preparedness to go the way of suffering. Important aspects of the gospel find a resonance in the Qur'an. Here is, according to Cragg, a starting point for a dialogue in depth on the impact of sin in human life and on the meaning of suffering.

The Qur'an speaks about Jesus, the prophet, the healer. The Qur'an does not tell much about the life of Jesus. Snaring the gospel is telling the story of Jesus' life. His life is the gospel, the good news. Not only what he did or said was (is) significant, but also significant was the way he was present among his contemporaries, as one who embodied God's affirming, unconditional love toward his creatures. This love was not merely taught, but manifested in a life of vulnerable availability to the neighbor, poor and rich, friend and enemy, sinner and victim. In embodying this divine love, Jesus was more than a prophet. 

The cross is not an isolated event, as in the Qur'an, but the supreme disclosure of this sacrificial, unconditional, divine love. In the resurrection, this way of life of Jesus, a way of life in which there is no place for vengeance and hate, was affirmed as the true way of life, intended by God for human beings created in his image. 

In going this way, disciples of Christ will come to a deeper understanding of Christ and a greater empathy for their Muslim neighbor.

The End.
Not Yet Verified.

Sources:
Roelf's Kuitse, Christology in the Qur'an.
Muhammad 'Ata'ur-Rahim, Ahmad Thomson,  Jesus, Prophet of Islam 
Robinson, J.M., The New Quest of the Historical Jesus, 1959. 
Robinson, J.M, Problem of History in Mark, 1957. 
Robertson, J .M., The Historical Jesus, 1916. 
Robson, Rev. James, Christ in Islam, 1929. 
Ruinus, Commentary on the Apostles' Creed, 1955. 
Rylcy, G.B., Barnabas, or the Great Renunciation, 1893. 
Sanday, Outlines of the Life of Christ. 
Sandmel, S., We Jews and Jesus, 1973. 
Santucci, L., Wrestling with Jesus, 1972. 
Savonarola, Verity of Christian Faith, 1651. 
Schmiedel, P.W., Jesus in Modern Criticism, 1907. 
Schokel, L.A., Understanding Bibical Research, 1968. 
Schweitzer, Albert, Christianity and the Religions of the World, 1923. 
Schweitzer, Albert, The Mysticism of Paul the Apostle, 1953. 
Schweitzer, Albert, Paul and his Interpreters. 
Schweitzer, Albert, The Kingdom of God and Primitive Christianity, 1968. 
Schweitzer, Albert, The Philosophy of Civilization, 1946. 
Schweitzer, Albert, A Psychiatric Study of Jesus, 1958. 
Schweitzer, Albert, The Story of Albert Schweitzer. 
Sox, David, The Gospel of Barnabas, 1984. 
Spark, Unitarian Miscellany. 
Spark, Christian Reformer. 
Stanley, A.R, The Eastern Church, 1869. 
Stanley, A.P., The Athanasian Creed, 1871. 
Stanley, A.P., Lectures on the History of the Eastern Church, 1883. 
Stevenson, J., Creeds, Councils, and Controversies. 
Stevenson, J., Studies in Eusebius, 1929. 
Stevenson, J., The New Eusebius. 
Taylor, John, The Scriptural Doctrine of Original Sin. 
Taylor, John, A History of the Octagon Church. 
Thomas-a-Kempis, Imitation of Christ, (translated by John Wesley), 1903. 
Thompson, F.A., Goths in Spain, 1969. 
Toland, John, Hypathia, 1753. 
Toland, John, The Nazarenes, 1718. 
Toland, John, Theological and Philosophical Works, 1732. 
Toland, John, Tetradymus. 
Towgood, Serious and Free Thoughts on the Present State of the Church, 
Vermas, G., Jesus, the Jew, 1973. 
Vos, J.G., A Christian Introduction to Religions of the World, 1965. 
Wallace, Anti-trinitarian Biographies, 1850. 
Warchaurr, J., Jesus or Christ?, 1909. 
Warfield, B.B., Jesus or Christ?, 1909. 
Whittaker, T., The Origins of Christianity, 1933. 
Wilbur, E.M., A History of Unitarianism in Transylvania, England, and America. 
Williamson, G.A., The History of the Church, 1965. 
Williamson, G.A., The Jewish War, 1959. 
Wilson, E.M., The Dead Sea Scrolls, 1969. 
Wisaart, H.S., Socialism and Christ, the Great Enemy of the Human Race, 1905. 
Workman, H.B., Persecution in the Early Church, 1960. 
Zahn, T., The Articles of the Apostles' Creed, 1899. 
Zahn, T., Introduction to the New Testament, 1909. 
Zahn, T., Peter, Saint and Apostle, 1889. 
al-Quran.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Soul: Soul in Islamic Philosophy.

Introduction:
Human soul, its existence, nature, ultimate objective and eternity, plays a vital role in Islamic philosophy. So, here in this article we are going to discuss in a short on Soul, Proof of its Existence, its Nature, its Rationality, its ultimate fate, Soul Journey, its Objective and its Eternity. al-Kindi, ibn Sina, ibn Rushd holds a view that all souls [those rational part of the souls that have knowledge] are indestructible because of its knowledge of the eternal aspects of the universe. 

In Ancient, Greek philosophers used the word "alive" for the concept of being "ensouled", ie. they consider that the soul gives the body to life. To them, the soul incorporeal or spiritual "breath"s that animates the living organism.

"In happy fate all die a death
That frees from care,
And yet there still will linger behind
A living image of life,
For this alone has come from the God.
It sleeps while the members are active;
But to those who sleep themselves
It reveals in myriad visions
The fateful approach 
Of adversities or delights".-Pindar

According to Pindar, the soul sleeps while the limbs are active, but when one is sleeping, the soul is active and reveals "an award of joy or sorrow drawing near" in dreams.-[Francis M. Cornford, Greek Religious Thought, p. 64]

Erwin Rohde says the Pre-Pythagorean belief was that the soul alive a body and is lifeless when it departed the body, and that departed, retired into Hades with no hope of returning to a body..[Erwin Rohde, Psyche, 1928]

Parts of the Soul:
According to Muslim Philosophers [al-Kindi, al-Farabi, ibn Sina and ibn Rushd], human soul consists of non-rational [by which the souls of plants and animals are created] and rational part that consists of the practical and theoretical intellects. To them, the non-rational part is linked essentially to the body, and the rational part as separate from the body by nature. The non-rational part  manages the body, while the rational part manages worldly affairs and the eternal aspects of the universes. The happiness of the soul depends on its ability to focus on the eternal aspects, separate itself from the demands of the body. And the non-rational part of the soul comes into being and unavoidably perishes, whereas the the rational part survive eternally [though some differs in some point].

Proof of Existence
According to ibn Sina, the existence of the soul proved from the fact that a body perform certain acts with some degree of will. These acts are exemplified in taking nourishment, growing, reproducing, moving and perceiving. Since these acts do not belong to the nature of body, for this nature is devoid of will, they must belong to a some they have other than body, which is ‘soul’. -[ibn Sina, al-Shifa’ (Healing)],

The soul is the source of acts performed by the will, not inasmuch as it is ‘a substance’ (an independent entity), but inasmuch as it is ‘the principle of such acts’. The rational soul, on the other hand, need not look outside itself to infer its existence. It is aware of its existence with immediacy, that is, without any instruments. ibn Sina’s argumented that the rational soul is aware of itself apart from body [ibn Sina cite an example of a suspended man], even if the adult rational soul is not aware of anything material, not even its body, it remains aware of its own existence. Thus we find in the Quran souls were answering God that asked to them-

And [mention] when your Lord took from the children of Adam - from their loins - their descendants and made them testify of themselves, [saying to them], "Am I not your Lord?" They said, "Yes, we have testified." [This] - lest you should say on the day of Resurrection, "Indeed, we were of this unaware."-[7:172]

Types of Soul:
Among the creation of God, there are Angels, Jinns, Heaven and Earth, Plants and Trees, Animal and Birds and Human; Angels are celestial being created from heatless fire. A part of them live in this material world as an extension of God ie they are in specific duties which they receive from God through book of life and the other part live in the unseen world near to God for their specific duties, such as writing the book of life as per instruction of God, safe-guard the book of life, holding the Throne of God, Praying to God for mankind for their sins and to forgive them and some for praising God standing surrounded His Throne. This Celestial being have their Celestial Soul.

After the creation of Angel, Jinns were created from fire. Like Human they are free willed. They are living in this Universe. Leader of the Jinns, Azael deny to bow down Adam, the first man thus become Iblees. God banned him enter into the heaven for disobeying His order and thus he became the enemy of Adam. He then misguide Adam-Eve with a false promise. Adam-Eve fell in his trap and disobey God. Then God through all of them to earth. Iblees promise to God to destroy mankind as he looses what he earned with his devotion to God for a period of seven million years God promised that he and those who shall follow him rejecting His guidance to the mankind, shall be the permanent resident of the Hell. This  nation Jinn posses terrestrial souls. And if not specified, a reference anywhere to :he soul shall be considered a terrestrial soul. 

Heaven and Earths are lifeless materials and thus free from taking nourishment, growing, reproducing, moving and perceiving. Yet they have souls because of their shape. They have internal senses of their existence and their creator. They able to answer God. It is said in the Quran- 

"Indeed, we offered the Trust to the heavens and the earth and the mountains, and they declined to bear it and feared it; but man [undertook to] bear it. Indeed, he was unjust and ignorant." [33:72]

Plants and Trees are in taking nourishment, growing, reproducing,but free from moving and perceiving. They have ‘soul’ and they aware of the existence and their creator. They Praise God and able to answer God. 

Animal and Birds are  in taking nourishment, growing, reproducing, moving but free from perceiving. They have souls and they aware of the existence and their creator. They Praise God and able to answer God. 

Human created from earth, and are free willed like Jinns. So after their death, they have to face God at the Judgement day for their deeds and shall be awarded Heaven or Hell as reward or punishment accordingly.They are capable in taking nourishment, growing, reproducing, moving and perceiving. ‘Soul’ (nafs) used to refer to the plant or vegetative part of a living being. On the other hand, the plant or vegetative part, the animal or sensitive part and the rational part ie. the totality of all these three parts means to be a ‘human soul’ that consists of non rational and rationl part. Thus, the word "soul" used for broad sense [to mean the human soul] or in the narrow sense [to mean a specific part of the soul].

Creation of Human Soul
All souls created from the first Human Adam-Eve. Quran says- "And [mention] when your Lord took from the children of Adam - from their loins - their descendants .."-[7:172]
According to kabbalah, underneath the throne (of God) itself lies the abode of all unborn human souls.

Body and Soul Relation:
The soul has a certain relation to a body, it is a form for that body, that is, the perfection of that body. It is a form because a natural body is composed of matter and form, which in the case of animals are body and soul. Since it has been shown that the soul is the source of will and therefore is not matter, it remains a form. Perfection is of two types, primary and secondary. A primary perfection is what makes a thing actually a species, as shape does for the sword, or a genus as sensation and-movement do for animals. A secondary perfection is an act necessitated by the nature of the species or genus, such as cutting for the sword and touching for animal. The soul is a primary perfection of a natural body capable of performing the secondary perfections necessitated by this primary perfection. Together with its body, the soul constitutes a material substance. This substance can be the subject of plant, animal or human life. The body is, therefore, an essential element in the definition of the soul. Noted that, ‘soul’sometimes used to refer to the rational part of the soul when it separates from the body and when it was attached with the body of a new born. 

The plant soul is the power human beings and other animals share with plants. If the body with a soul is an animal, the soul develops into the animal soul, which is a primary perfection for an organic natural body inasmuch as this body has sensation and movement through will. While this soul includes the plant soul, it has also a sensitive power and a locomotive one. The sensitive power has both external and internal senses. The external senses are, in priority of existence, touch, taste, smell, hearing and sight. The first three are said to be necessary for survival and the last two for well being. In Talkhis kitab an-nafs (Commentary on Aristotle’s On the Soul), ibn Rushd asserts that the five external senses may be in potentiality, as in infancy and sleep, or in actuality, as in daily seeing or hearing. He also argues that there cannot be any external sense other than these five because there would be no function for it, since there is no external sensation other than the objects of the five senses mentioned above. 

And for internal senses, it is generaly considered that they are 3 in number, common sense, imagination and memory. ibn Sina enumerates five internal senses: common sense, representational power, imagination, estimative power and memory, whereas, the representational and estimative powers, others allocate it to the imagination. The common sense is an internal power in which all the objects of the external senses are collected. Contrary to the external senses, which can grasp only one type of sensation, as sight grasps light and hearing grasps sound, the common sense can grasp all external sensations, such as that honey is of such and such a colour, texture and smell. The representational power preserves the sensations of the common sense even after sensible things disappear. The imagination selects at will to combine some of the objects of the representational power with each other and to separate the rest. It makes its judgment about external things, but in the absence of these things. That is why it functions best when the external senses, which represent external things, are not at work, as in sleep. 

ibn Rushd points out that animals such as worms and flies that do not act except in the presence of sensible things are devoid of imagination. The imagination is called such inasmuch as it is an animal instrument; it is called cognitive inasmuch as it is a rational instrument. The estimative power grasps non-sensible notions of sensible things, such as the sheep’s notion that the wolf is to be avoided. This notion is about a sensible thing but is not grasped through the external senses, as is the colour or shape of a wolf. Memory preserves the notions of the estimative power. The imagination acts on the objects of memory in the same way it acts on those of the representational powers. Like the objects of the external senses, those of the internal senses are particular and material. The difference is that they can be experienced in the absence of external things and are to some degree abstracted from matter.

The locomotive power branches into that which causes movement and that which actually moves. The former, the desiderative power, subdivides into the appetitive and the irascible. The appetitive causes movement toward what is imagined to be necessary or beneficial in the pursuit of pleasure. The irascible causes avoidance of what is imagined to be harmful or an impediment in the pursuit of dominance. The power that actually moves uses the nerves to relax the muscles at the demands of the appetitive power or tighten them at the demands of the irascible one.

Rational Soul:
Both the non rational and rational part of human soul were attached with the first human Adam. The rational part, which is the intellects of the soul received the knowledge that God teaches Adam. Similarly it received the practical Knowledge of Evil which was done by Adam disobeying God. That is, the rational part of the soul receives both practical and the theoretical intellects. Quran says- 

And [by] the soul and He who proportioned it, And inspired it [with discernment of] its wickedness and its righteousness, -[91:7-8] 

Before sending Adam to the earth, the rational parts of his children, which has already the knowledge of God and Evil, taken out from his back. 

This rational part, ie. the intellects of the soul, when it attached to the body at the time of birth, it began to store very detailed knowledge of the body that continued upto the death. All the stored information is in a codic form of the original light, signal and energy. 

The Practical Intellect seeks knowledge in order to act in accordance with the good in its individual body, its family and its state. It must, therefore, know the principles for properly managing the body, the family and the state, that is, ethics, home management and politics. The practical intellect is the rational soul turning its face downward. The function of the theoretical intellect is to know just for the sake of having the universals (the realities or natures of things). Some of these natures, such as God and the intellect, cannot attach to movement; knowledge of them is metaphysics. Other natures, such as unity, can attach to movement but do not; knowledge of them is mathematics. Still other natures, such as humanity and squareness, can attach to movement either in reality and thought, such as humanity, or in reality but not in thought, such as squareness. Knowledge of these is physics.

The theoretical intellect is the rational soul with its face upward. The practical intellect looks up to the theoretical one and moves its body accordingly. In this, the practical intellect is similar to :the celestial soul that looks up to the intellect of its sphere and moves its sphere accordingly. Thus, like .the celestial soul, the practical intellect is the link between intellect as such and matter. al-Kindi’s divided the theoretical intellect into the following category-

i). The material intellect (al-‘aql al-hayulant): The material intellect is a blank slate with the potentiality for grasping the intelligible forms or universals. ibn Sina points out that it is referred to as material, not because it is actually material but because it resembles matter in accepting the form. 
ii). The habitual intellect (al-‘agl bil-malaka): The habitual intellect grasps the universals, as one acquires the skill to write; in other words, this intellect has the ability to use the universals but does not always do so. 
iii). The actual intellect (al-‘aql bi’!-fi’b): The actual intellect grasps the universals in actuality and is always ready to use them. 
iv). The acquired intellect’ (al-‘aql al-mustafad): The general view of the acquired intellect is that it is the highest human state, the point of contact with the divine, the agent intellect (the intelligence of the moon, the lowest celestial intellect), which makes it possible for the theoretical intellect to acquire the universals in the purest form.  

Soul Journey
How a soul came to existence from the unseen to this material world and then to the specific body? or in reverse, how the soul separated from the body and return to its destination that is pre defined? According to some Philosophers, the Rational part of the Soul comes into existence as a leaf of the Tree of Life (Lote Tree) which is in the abode of angels, before the new born. Angels (Gabriel, Micheal with other 4 angels [for guide and take care of the baby) brought that soul to the new born; And when the baby takes his first breath, the rational part with that breath attached to the non rational part of the body, just as a ship anchored into a Jetty. Understanding this soul Journey, we cite an example as in the case of a protein molecule-

Each cell is a factory that produces molecules, that have to be delivered to other places inside the cell, or exported out of the cell, at exactly the right moment. Bubble-like vesicles, surrounded by membranes, shuttle the cargo between organelles and piled up in certain parts of the cell to release their cargo to the outside. A set of genes that control vesicle traffic. When a chemical signal called neurotransmitter that sent from the nerve cell, reached the surface of the cell, it signals protein machinery to deliver the cargo. Then protein machinery instruct vesicles to release their cargo with precision.The vesicle then fuse with their targets and transfer the cargo outside. The neurotransmitter takeover the cargo that released outside and transport it through the blood and delivered in the right place in the right moment.

Similarly when a baby going to born, his soul from his abode released and reached to a particular place ie. something like a wormhole of the border between unseen and material world guided by angels. The soul released in the material world and received by the angel for guiding and protection brought the soul to the right place, to the right body in  the right time and the soul enter the body with the first breath of the baby. [But, H. W. Robinson argues that it is not a spiritual entity that enters the body at birth and leaves it at death but a principle of life that animates the body]

The process of taking a soul from a body, Azrael told Solomon "As often as a believer dies, Gabriel attends me, and wraps his soul in a green silken sheet, and then breathes it into a green bird, which feeds in Paradise until the day of the resurrection. But the soul of the sinner I take alone, and having wrapped it in a coarse, pitch-covered woolen cloth, carry it to the gates of hell, where it wanders among abominable vapors until the last day."

When the angel of death, Azrael, separate the rational part of the soul from the body and then brought it back to God in his custody. He then with God's permission stored it to Illiyin or Sijjin according to the deeds of the dead in his lifetime. 

After death, the souls separated from the body taken by the angel of death and preserved in illiyin or sijjin. If the soul is righteous, when it will taken, the angel will say-, "O reassured soul, Come back thou to thy Lord,- well pleased (thyself), and well-pleasing unto Him!"-[Qur'an 89:27-28] and his records (Amalnama) then preserved in illiyin, verily the record of the Righteous is (preserved) in 'Illiyin.-[Qur'an 83:18-19] and when the wrong-doers reach the pangs of death and the angels stretch their hands out (saying): Deliver up your souls. This day ye are awarded doom of degradation for that ye spake concerning Allah other than the truth, and used to scorn His portents.-[Qur'an 6:93] his recodrs preserved in sijjin. Surely the record of the wicked is (preserved) in Sijjin.-[Qur'an 83:7-8] 

The records of a person preserved in illiyin or sijjin according to the deeds of the person, but his souls to be preserved there too, not mentioned by the Quran. Though ibn Kathir says- Sijjin is "a place to go back and stay bad people", and Illiyin is "back where good people". Sijjin is the seventh of the earth, in which there is the spirit of the infidels', then Illiyin is seventh heaven topped with the spirit of the believers'.-[Tafsir Ibn Kathir] 

ibn Sina, who believed that the rational soul is the essence of the non rational soul. ibn Rushd, believed that the soul (non rational and rational is originally not separated], ie. the whole human soul comes into existence. He argues that since the rational soul grasps the universals from particular sensibles, and since such sensibles are material and have a temporal beginning, this soul must also be material and must have a temporal beginning. Those who attribute non-materiality to the essence of the rational soul, such as al Kindi and ibn Sina, assert that this soul pre-exists the body according to Qur'an. It says-

"And [mention] when your Lord took from the children of Adam - from their loins - their descendants .."-[7:172]

Objective of the soul:
al-Farabi asserts that even though the soul is of different parts, it is a unity with all its parts working for one final end, happiness. While the plant soul, for example, serves a specific function, it also serves the powers that are higher than it in rank, the animal powers. Without nourishment, growth and reproduction, the animal powers cannot perform their necessary functions. Similarly, while the function of the animal powers is to have sensation and movement, by performing this function they also promote the functions of the powers above them, the rational ones. The operations of the animal powers, especially those of the senses, are particularly important for the attainment of the final end.

The external senses strip the forms from material objects and convey them to the internal senses. The more they are transferred internally, the less mixed with matter do they become. Since the innermost sense they reach is the imagina­tion, they are there in their purest material existence The role of the objects of the imagination is not always clearly defined in Islamic philosophy. Occasionally it is said by somebody like ibn Sina to be one of preparation for the theoretical intellect to receive the universals from the agent intellect. At other times ibn Sina, like other Aristotelians such as ibn Rushd, takes these objects to be the ingredients out of which the universals are made after the last process of purification. It seems, however, that in either case the light of the agent intellect is needed to complete the process. In the former case, this light gives the intelligible forms to the theoretical intellect when this intellect is prepared. In the latter case, it sheds itself on the objects of the imagination, which are then reflected on the theoretical intellect without their matter. Since the theoretical intellect is in its first stages in potentiality, it cannot act on the objects of the imagination directly; hence the need for the agent intellect, which is pure actuality. The role of the practical intellect in all this is to put order into the body. This sets free the theoretical intellect from preoccupation with the body and helps the powers whose function is necessary for theoretical knowledge to function unhampered.

Some philosophers holds the view that the acquired intellect is one with its objects, for they thought the knower and the known are one. This means that the highest human state is one in which unity with the universals or the eternal aspects of the universe is reached. This state is described as happiness because in it eternity, an aspect of the objects of the acquired. intellect, is attained. For example Zarathustra, Buddha, or some sufi as Anal Haq. But others consider that the knower, actually not one, it is the combination of non rational and rational soul.

Eternity/Immortality of ths soul:
There is a thing which we call good and another which we call evil. You will be agree with me in thinking that the corrupting and destroying element is the evil, and the saving and improving element the good. And we will admit that everything has a good and also an evil; as ophthalmia is the evil of the eyes and disease of the whole body; as mildew is of corn, and rot of timber, or rust of copper and iron: in everything, or in almost everything, there is an inherent evil and disease.

And anything which is infected by any of these evils is made evil, and at last wholly dissolves and dies. The vice and evil which is inherent in each is the destruction of each; and if this does not destroy them there is nothing else that will; for good certainly will not destroy them, nor again, that which is neither good nor evil. If, then, we find any nature which having this inherent corruption cannot be dissolved or destroyed, we may be certain that of such a nature there is no destruction.

In case of Soul, there are evils and those are unrighteousness, intemperance, cowardice, ignorance. But does any of these dissolve or destroy her? -and here we do not  fall into the error of supposing that the unjust and foolish man, when he is detected, perishes through his own injustice, which is an evil of the soul.

Taking in consideration the analogy of the body, the evil of the body is a disease which wastes and reduces and annihilates the body; and all the things of which we were just now speaking come to annihilation through their own corruption attaching to them and inhering in them and so destroying them. 

Now, we will consider the soul in like manner. We can say, the injustice or other evil which exists in the soul can’t waste and consume her. They can’t by attaching to the soul and inhering in her at last bring her to death and so separate her from the body.

And yet, it is unreasonable to suppose that anything can perish from without through affection of external evil which could not be destroyed from within by a corruption of its own.

Again Consider, that even the badness of food, whether staleness, decomposition, or any other bad quality, when confined to the actual food, is not supposed to destroy the body; although, if the badness of food communicates corruption to the body, then we should say that the body has been destroyed by a corruption of itself, which is disease, brought on by this; but that the body, being one thing, can be destroyed by the badness of food, which is another, and which does not engender any natural infection -this we shall absolutely deny. And, on the same principle, unless some bodily evil can produce an evil of the soul, we must not suppose that the soul, which is one thing, can be dissolved by any merely external evil which belongs to another.

Either then, let us refute this conclusion, or, while it remains unrefuted, let us never say that fever, or any other disease, or the knife put to the throat, or even the cutting up of the whole body into the minutest pieces, can destroy the soul, until she herself is proved to become more unholy or unrighteous in consequence of these things being done to the body; but that the soul, or anything else if not destroyed by an internal evil, can be destroyed by an external one, is not to be affirmed by any man.

And surely, no one will ever prove that the souls of men become more unjust in consequence of death. But if someone who would rather not admit the immortality of the soul boldly denies this, and says that the dying do really become more evil and unrighteous, then, if the speaker is right, I suppose that injustice, like disease, must be assumed to be fatal to the unjust, and that those who take this disorder die by the natural inherent power of destruction which evil has, and which kills them sooner or later, but in quite another way from that in which, at present, the wicked receive death at the hands of others as the penalty of their deeds.

And in that case injustice, if fatal to the unjust, will not be so very terrible to him, for he will be delivered from evil. But I rather suspect the opposite to be the truth, and that injustice which, if it have the power, will murder others, keeps the murderer alive --aye, and well awake too; so far removed is her dwelling-place from being a house of death.

So, if the inherent natural vice or evil of the soul is unable to kill or destroy her, hardly will that which is appointed to be the destruction of some other body, destroy a soul or anything else except that of which it was appointed to be the destruction.

But the soul which cannot be destroyed by an evil, whether inherent or external, must exist for ever, and if existing forever, must be immortal.

That is the conclusion, and, if a true conclusion, then the souls must always be the same, for if none be destroyed they will not diminish in number. Neither will they increase, for the increase of the immortal natures must come from something mortal, and all things would thus end in immortality.

What a person does is recorded and will be judged at the final court of God. They will either go to heaven or hell, depending on whether or not they did well in the test that was given to them in this world by Allah. Thus after Qiyamah, when Angel Israfil blows the Triumph receiving the order of God, the souls from its abode (Illiyin and Sijjin) blown out and come down to earth, the sound wave of the triumph broke the code, and the emitted light wave and energy signal will create an organic natural body of its highest perfection for the soul to attached the body permanently.The rational part of the soul may be compared as a virtual computer with a bugless operating system that stored data and information of the bodily computer it attached in such a way that  it can produced the bodily computer with the same configuration but with a highest performance with all of its stored information, if the bodily computer vanishes anyway.[Book of Chamois, by Husayn ibn Mahmud]

Conclusion
Actually, we have a little knowledge of Soul. And  the Qur'an mentions this as an answer, when prophet asked about the soul:

And they ask you, about the soul. Say, "The soul (Rûh) is of the affair of my Lord. And mankind have not been given of knowledge except a little." - [Qur'an 17:85]
It is Allah that takes the souls at death: and those that die not (He takes their souls) during their sleep: then those on whom He has passed the Decree of death He keeps back (their souls from returning to their bodies); but the rest He sends (their souls back to their bodies) for a term appointed. Verily in this are Signs for those who contemplate. -[Qur'an 39:42]

The End.
Not Yet Revised.

Sources:
Shams c. Inati, (1996) Soul in Islamic Phylosophy.
Shams c. Inati (1996) A Study of ibn Sina’s Mysticism, 
Abu Nasr al-Farabi (c.870-950) al-Madina al fadila (The Virtuous City), trans. R. Walter,  Oxford:  1985. 
al-Farabi (c.870-950) Mabadi’ Ara’Ah al-Madina al-Fadila (on the Perfect State.), Oxford:  1985. Aristotle,  On the Soul
ibn Rushd (c.1174) Talkhis kitab an-nafs (Commentary on Aristotle’s On the Soul), ed. A.F. al-Ahwani, 
ibn Rushd (1180) Tahafut al-tahafut (The Incoherence of the Incoherence), trans. S. Van Den Bergh, London:  1954. 
ibn Rushd, (c.1174)  Risalat al-ittisal (Essay on Conjunction) 
ibn Baja, Risalat al-ittisal (Essay on Conjunction)
Ishaq ibn Hunayn, Kitab ft an-nafs (Book on the Soul), 
ibn Sina (980-1037) an-Nafs (The Soul), ed. F. Rahman, London:  1959. 
ibn Sina (980-1037) Ahwal an-nafs (The States of the Soul), ed. A.F. al-Ahwani, Cairo:  1952. 
ibn Sina- (980-1037) an-Najat (Deliverance), ed. F. Rahman, London: 1952. 
ibn Sina- (980-1037) Rasa’d ash-shaykh ar-ra’is f asrar al-hikma al-mashriqiyya (‘oriental philosophy), ed. M. Mehren, Leiden: Brill, 1889-99. 
al-Kindi (- 873) Rasa’il al-Kindi al falsafiyya (al-Kindi’s Philosophical Treatises), ed. M. Abu Rida, Cairo: 1953. 
al-Kindi, (- 873) Risalat al-‘aql (Essay on Intellect).
Maktabat an-Nahda, 1950. 
al-Quran.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Sunday, June 05, 2016

Satan: Fell through Pride or through disobedience?


We know Satan always tempts man to do evil.But do you know he fell through Pride or through disobedience? To find its answer, we have to go back to the initial stage of creation Human.

When God intend to create human, He created a mass of earth, and then left it for twenty-five thousand years without doing aught else; Satan, who was as it were priest and head of the angels, by the great understanding that he possessed, knew that God of that mass of earth was to take one hundred and forty four thousand signed with the mark of prophecy, and the soul of His Habib, the seal of His Messengers, had created sixty thousand years before aught else;.Therefore, being indignant, he instigated the angels, saying: "Look you, one day God shall will that this earth be revered by us. Wherefore consider that we are spirit, and therefore it is not fitting so to do."

Many therefore forsook God.

Whereupon said God, one day when all the angels were assembled: "Let each one that holds me for his lord straightway do reverence to this earth."
They that loved God bowed themselves, but Satan, with them that were of his mind, said: "O Lord, we are spirit, and therefore it is not just that we should do reverence to this clay;."

Having said this, Satan became horrid and of fearsome look, and his followers became hideous; because for their rebellion God took away from them the beauty wherewith he had endued them in creating them. Whereat the holy angels, when, lifting their heads, they saw how terrible a monster Satan;had become, and his followers, cast down their face to earth in fear.

Then said Satan: "O Lord, you have unjustly made me hideous, but I am content there at, because I desire to annul all that you shall do.’
And the other devils said: "Calf him not Lord, O Lucifer;, for you are Lord."
Then said God to the followers of Satan: "Repent you, and recognize me as God, your creator."
They answered: "We repent of having done you any reverence, for that you are not just; but Satan is just.’ 
Then said God: "Depart from me, O you cursed, for I have no mercy on you."

And in his departing Satan spat up that mass of earth, and that spittle the angel Gabriel lifted up with some earth, so that therefore now man has the navel in his belly." 

He who makes not prayer is more wicked than Satan, and shall suffer greater torments. Because Satan had, before his fall, no example of fearing, nor did God so much as send him any prophet to invite him to repentance: but man now that all the prophets already come even the Messiah, the seal of the prophets, because so God wills. Jesus prepare his way and albeit he had infinite examples of the justice of God, lived carelessly without any fear, as though there were no God. Even as of such spoke the prophet David; "The fool has said in his heart, there is no God. Therefore, are they corrupt and become abominable, without one of them doing good."

Now we will see how man sinned through pride? Again we have to back to the story of creation. When God has expelled Satan, and the angel Gabriel had purified that mass of earth whereon Satan spat, God created everything that lives, both of the animals that fly and of them that walk and swim, and he adorned the world with all that it has.

One day Satan approached to the gates of paradise, and, seeing the horses eating grass, he announced to them that if that mass of earth should receive a soul there would be for them grievous labour; and that therefore it would be to their advantage to trample that piece of earth in such wise that it should be no more good for anything.

The horses aroused themselves and impetuously set themselves to run over that piece of earth which lay among lilies and roses;. Whereupon God gave spirit to that unclean portion of earth upon which lay the spittle of Satan, which Gabriel had taken up from the mass; and raised up the dog, who, barking, filled the horses with fear, and they fled.

Then God gave his soul to man, while all the holy angels sang: "Blessed be your holy name, O God our Lord."
"Adam, having sprung upon his feet, saw in the air a writing that shone like the sun;, which said: "There is only one God, and Muhammad is the Messenger of God."

Whereupon Adam opened his mouth and said: "I thank you, O Lord my God, that you have deigned to create me; but tell me. I pray you, what means the message of these words: "Muhammad is Messenger of God. Have there been other men before me?"

'Then said God: "Be you welcome, O my servant Adam. I tell you that you are the first man whom I have created. And he whom you have seen [mentioned] is your son, who shall come into the world many years hence, and shall be my Messenger, for whom I have created all things; who shall give light to the world when he shall come; whose soul was set in a celestial splendour;sixty thousand years before I made any. thing."

Adam besought God, saying: "Lord, grant me this writing upon the nails of the fingers of my hands."
Then God gave to the first man upon his thumbs that writing; upon the thumb-nail of the right hand it said: "There is only one God;," and upon the thumb-nail of the left it said: "Muhammad is Messenger ;of God." Then with fatherly affection Adam, the first man kissed those words, and rubbed his eyes, and said: "Blessed be that day when you shall come to the world."

Seeing the man alone, God said: "It is not well that he should remain alone."
Wherefore he made him to sleep, and took a rib from near his heart, filling the place with flesh. Of that rib made he Eve, and gave her to Adam for his wife.

He set the twain of them as lords of Paradise, to whom he said: "Behold I give to you every fruit to eat, except the apples and the corn" whereof he said: "Beware that in no wise you eat of these fruits, for you shall become unclean, insomuch that I shall not suffer. You to remain here, but shall drive you forth, and you shall suffer great miseries." 

When Satan had knowledge of this he became mad with indignation, and so he drew near to the gate of paradise where a horrid serpent with legs like a camel, and nails on his feet [that] cut like a razor on every side, stood on guard. The enemy said to him: 'Let me to enter into paradise.'

The serpent answered: 'How shall I let you enter [since] God has commanded me to cast you out?'
Satan answered: 'You see how much God loves you; he has set you outside of paradise to keep guard over a lump of clay, which is man! If you bring me into paradise I will make you so terrible that every one shall flee you, and so you shall go and stay at your pleasure.'
Then the serpent said: 'And how shall I set you within [paradise]?'

Satan said, 'You are great: therefore, open your mouth, and I will enter into your belly, and so [when] you enter into paradise [you] shall place me near to those two lumps of clay that are newly walking upon the earth.'

Then the serpent did so, and placed Satan near Eve, for Adam, her husband, was sleeping. Satan presented himself before the woman like a beauteous angel, and said to her: 'Why do you not eat of those apples and corn?'

Eve answered: 'Our God has said to us that [if we] eat [them] we shall be unclean, and he will drive us from paradise.'
Satan answered: 'He does not speak the truth! You must know that God is wicked and envious, and suffers no equals, but keeps every one as a slave. [This is] why he has said this [to you]; in order that you may not become equal to him. But if you and your companion do according to my counsel, you shall eat of those fruits as [you eat] of the other [fruits], and you shall not remain subject to others but like God you shall know good and evil, and you shall do whatever you please, because you shall be equal to God.'

Then Eve took and ate of those [fruits], and when her husband awoke she told [him everything] that Satan had said; and he took and ate the fruit [when] his wife offered them to him. But, as the food was going down, he remembered the words of God, and, wishing to stop the food, he put his hand into his throat, where every man has the mark

Then both of them knew that they were naked, and, being ashamed, they took fig leaves and made a clothing for their secret parts. When midday was passed, God appeared to them, and called Adam, saying: 'Adam, where are you?'

He answered: 'Lord, I hid myself from your presence because my wife and I are naked, and so we are ashamed to present ourselves before you.'
Then God said: 'And who has robbed you of your innocence, unless you have eaten the fruit [that makes you] unclean, and will not be able to abide [any] longer in paradise?'

Adam answered: 'O Lord, the wife whom you have given me [urged] me to eat [it] and so I have eaten it.'
Then God said to the woman: 'Why did you give [this] food to your husband?'
Eve answered: 'Satan deceived me, and so I ate [the fruit].'
'And how did that reprobate enter into [the garden]?' said God.
Eve answered: 'A serpent that stands at the northern gate brought him near to me.'

Then God said to Adam: 'Because you have [listened to] your wife and have eaten the fruit, cursed be the earth in your works; it shall bring forth brambles and thorns for you, and you shall eat bread by the sweat of your face. Remember that you are earth, and to earth you return.'

And he spoke to Eve, saying: 'And you who did [listen] to Satan, and gave the food to your husband, shall abide under the dominion of man, who shall keep you as a slave, and you shall bear children with travail.'

And having called the serpent, God called the angel Michael, who holds the sword of God, [and] said: 'First drive this wicked serpent forth from paradise, and when outside cut off his legs: for if he wants to walk, he must trail his body upon the earth.'

Afterwards God called Satan, who came laughing, and he said to him: 'Because you, reprobate, have deceived [Adam and Eve] and have made them unclean, I will that every uncleanness [from] them and [from] all their children - [of which] they shall be truly penitent and shall serve me - in going forth from their body shall enter through your mouth, and so shall you be satiated with uncleanness.'

Satan then gave a horrible roar, and said: 'Since you will to make me [continually] worse, I will make me that which I shall be able!'
Then said God: 'Depart, cursed one, from my presence!'
Then Satan departed, and God said to Adam [and] Eve, who were both weeping: 'Go forth from paradise, and do penance, and do not let your hope fail, for I will send your son so that your seed shall lift the dominion of Satan from off the human race: for I will give all things to he who shall come, my Messenger.'

God hid himself [from Adam and Eve], and the angel Michael drove them forth from paradise. Then, Adam, turning around, saw written above the gate, There is only one God, and Muhammad is Messenger of God. Weeping, he said: 'May it be pleasing to God, O my son, that you come quickly and draw us out of misery.'

And this is the story of Satan, who fell through pride  by despising man.

The End.
Not Yet Verified.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.